If there’s two causes for which I’ve been a steadfast champion throughout my decades of advocacy as a community leader, it’s my stalwart commitment to fighting for a low-carbon communities and my commitment to getting big money out of politics. I believe that big money is corrupting our politics in the same manner in which carbon is polluting our atmosphere – our democracy depends on elections having to be won instead of bought, and our rising oceans demand nothing short of radical transformation of our land use and transportation decisions to manage the decline of fossil fuel infrastructure, not more of the status quo.
It’s been evident for months that my opponent in the November election does not share these commitments to either accountable elections and saving the planet.
But this week, my campaign learned that my opponent has taken donations from staunch Rose Quarter Freeway Expansion supporters, including a $1000 contribution from the president of a business chosen to win contracts for the project as well a contribution from a member of the Oregon Transportation Commission.
As of today, my opponent has reported at least 24 donors who have given her at least $1000 – including $9000 from the Portland Metropolitan Association of Realtors.
I am running a grassroots campaign because I believe that everyday Portlanders, not corporate interests with deep pockets, should be deciding who will stick up for climate justice at our regional government.
I assume you probably don’t have $9000 sitting around to donate to my campaign – and if you did, I couldn’t take it, because I’ve voluntarily capped my campaign contributions at $500. I’m not a career politician – I’m just a grassroots wonk who knows that solving our overlapping housing, transportation, covid-19 and climate crises will require brave leadership and policy acumen unencumbered by the messy politics of attempting to govern while answering to those who gave large corporate campaign contributions.
Here’s the bad news. My opponent *is* a career politician, she *is* taking $9000 donations from corporate interests, and I’m about 25 donations short of my goal for the month of July.
I’ve had 85 donations this month, with 80% of them being for $100 or less. But my campaign manager insists that I get 25 more donations before the end of the weekend; until we have massive campaign finance reform (which I hope to work on at Metro!), I simply have to ask you to dig deep, if you’re able, to invest in getting an unapologetic climate champion elected to the Metro Council.
Will you please join my grassroots campaign and donate today?
I won’t keep you in suspense – I plan to testify later this week in support of Metro placing the Get Moving measure on the November ballot. I will squeeze some subset of the thoughts below into three minutes of testimony.
This will not be an unreserved endorsement, and my fellow transportation advocates are split on this measure. Some have withering (and not invalid) criticisms of the SW Corridor light rail project. And others point out that the package of investments does not significantly move the needle on transit mode share – something essential to our climate goals. But on the whole, most advocates are part of the Getting There Together Coalition, who has worked hard to improve the package and are supporting the referral. I’m appreciative and supportive of their efforts and position.
The Yardstick
What should we expect transportation investments to do? Many things, including critically:
Provide access to jobs, housing and economic opportunity
Improve safety
Make the transportation system more equitable
Reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions
The proposal fails in particular on the last dimension. According to the staff evaluation, it is effectively neutral with respect to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and GHG. Even being neutral is a vast improvement over the road-heavy package of investments TriMet was looking at three years ago! But we still have to address the fact that transportation is now 42% of regional GHG and is growing.
I also applaud Metro’s commitment to equity, as represented by targeted investments in East Multnomah County and on deadly roads like Washington County’s TV Highway. Fixing these dangerous arterials by investing in safer intersections, better sidewalks and bus lane improvements represents significant health, mobility, and quality of life improvements to the parts of our region with the largest BIPOC and low-income communities. And the $65M directed at Albina Vision is a particularly welcome investment here in District 5.
There are other elements I don’t like (Airport Way overpass for example) but on balance these are good projects, and the “better bus” components will enable transit to get around cars when we add more transit service in the future – a critical enabler for what has to come next.
What’s Missing?
We won’t successfully address our transportation GHG until we do two big new things beyond this package:
Create a comprehensive approach to Transportation Demand Management. This will mostly likely look like some form of Congestion Pricing.
Dramatically improve the quantity, frequency, and convenience of transit in the region. We can’t do this nearly quickly enough with Light Rail, so this means a lot more buses.
We also need to continue and accelerate building more housing near transit. State level policy on some form of carbon pricing will also help if it eventually comes to pass.
Those are bigger than one ballot measure, but let’s all be clear that we’re not really addressing climate change in our transportation system until we grapple with them!
The Revenue Source and Timing
We’re going to hear a lot about the appropriateness of using a payroll tax and of launching it in the middle of the pandemic-driven recession.
I agree that it’s not an ideal tax. Taxes are a policy choice in themselves, as taxing something discourages it, and we don’t want to discourage payroll!
I’d much rather use some kind of carbon tax, or even a vehicle registration fee that is made progressive by linking it to vehicle value, size or weight. I fully agree with Metro Council’s choice to take a flat vehicle registration fee – which would be highly regressive – off the table.
The reality is that Metro has a limited range of taxing authorities, and the ones I’d like are not on the table right now. As a Metro Councilor I’ll work to put more progressive and green revenue options on Metro’s legislative agenda. But we have to move forward now using what’s possible.
And if this tax really is a drag on the local economy when it is first collected in 2022, Metro Council has the authority to reduce the tax rate (presumably to zero if they wanted) – of course they’d have to adjust the projects and programs if they did that. I don’t think that argument is a reason not to go to the ballot this year – but it will clearly be a big issue in the campaign.
Wrapping Up
This measure is not by itself a solution to climate change, but it’s a useful and probably politically necessary first step. Let’s build some momentum and then go on to address demand management and higher transit frequency!
I’ve been involved in discussions about a regional transportation measure since the early years of the century when I served on TPAC. It’s time!
Join me, members of the Getting There Together Coalition, and other community advocates at Metro’s hearing to refer the measure this Thursday.
Today, according to reports from Willamette WeekandThe Portland Mercury, Albina Vision Trust and a number of elected leaders are officially revoking their support of ODOT’s proposed Rose Quarter Freeway Expansion.
I cast the first “no” vote by a public official on the “Rose Quarter Improvement Project” when I asked to separate the freeway from the rest of the N/NE Quadrant plan back in 2012. I was the only vote in opposition at that time. It was evident to me then that having a freeway expansion be the largest investment in our 2035 Central City Plan made no sense. And it was clear that the ‘surface improvements’ being offered up by ODOT would not offset the further injury to air quality, climate and safety that yet another urban freeway expansion would create.
It’s been a long effort since then, including the formation of the No More Freeways campaign in 2017, but I’m glad to see that Albina Vision and others have reached the inevitable conclusion that ODOT is fundamentally not responsive to community concerns, and that no amount of “mitigations” can offset the harms created by further expansion of urban freeways.
In the current moment, it’s also important to recognize that urban freeways have been devastating to BIPOC communities, that the original construction of I-5 split Portland’s largest Black neighborhood in half, and was part of a racist public construction agenda in Albina and its surrounding area. It remains a vital priority to correct that injustice, and I look forward to continuing to support the work of Albina Vision.
I’m delighted that the proposed Metro Transportation package includes $50 million for investment in the Albina neighborhood. Racial justice and climate justice are tightly interwound, and as a Metro Councilor I will prioritize both.
Do you hear the sound of glass breaking? Those are paradigms being shattered!
As someone who has worked tirelessly to promote climate-smart communities, healthier transportation systems and affordable housing by breaking the paradigm of overreliance on drive-alone auto trips, and the freeway-industrial complex that supports it, this is very exciting to me.
But this is NOT the moment for that paradigm.
This moment is about how policing impacts America’s BIPOC communities, and its contributions to institutional racism. I’m smart enough to realize that I’m not the right leader for that conversation, and I’m listening carefully (and gratefully) to the leadership of groups like PAALF, Unite Oregon and Urban League of Portland.
I’ve also looked at what role Metro may have on this specific topic, and believe it is minimal to none. Metro’s park rangers have limited enforcement authority (they write citations) and don’t carry lethal weapons. And Metro contracts with local police departments only minimally. But if elected, I’ll take a careful look at those and other security functions at Metro, with an eye towards ensuring that we’re focusing on community safety and problem solving, and hearing from impacted communities how best to address these injustices. And just this week, I submitted testimony to TriMet’s board echoing OPAL – Environmental Justice Oregon’s to look at defunding transit police.
But if we zoom out, this moment is just a piece of addressing widespread systemic, institutional racism in our communities. And Metro definitely does have a role in that greater fight. As Urban League President Nkenge Harmon Johnson pointed out at a recent event, the policy recommendations of Portland Urban League’s 2015 “State of Black Oregon” report are just as meaningful today in 2020! I’ve also reviewed the PAALF “People’s Plan”. I was struck by how many of their recommendations directly overlapped with Metro’s primary goals, and how urgent it is that our regional government proactively review these policies with lens towards racial justice:
Stable housing
An adequate housing supply
Subsidized affordable housing (including transportation affordability as part of overall household affordability)
Stabilize renters including preservation of “naturally occurring” affordable housing
Policies and programs to prevent displacement
Enforce Fair Housing standards
Programs to help people maintain/sustain housing they already own
Workforce preparation and participation
A diverse Metro workforce
Continuing support for Metro’s C2P2 program (Construction Career Pathways Project)
Healthy, vibrant and economically viable neighborhoods
Healthy air quality
Access to safe recreation, including parks and open spaces
Land use planning to put community needs in walking distance for most folks
Equitable investment in neighborhoods
Use race-informed health impact assessments when planning investments
Increase civic engagement, especially in displaced neighborhoods
Investments to build capacity for participation by BIPOC communities
Meet communities where they are at, in their spaces
Offer childcare at hearings and open houses
Consider providing a stipend for folks serving on advisory committees
Hybridize in-person and online participation in meetings in the post-Covid world
Create a public campaign finance system for Metro to enable more diverse fields of candidates
Provide access via good land use planning and affordable transportation to:
Jobs
Education
Recreation
Daily needs like healthy food
Transit Justice – provide better access, especially from areas that people have been displaced to
Examine racial equity in pedestrian and cycling infrastructure
I’ve spent a decade working on revamping Portland’s policy documents to prioritize BIPOC communities, but I’ve also witnessed the implementation of those policies stall to a large degree. I’m ready to focus on that implementation at Metro – and prioritize results for frontline communities who have waited for far too long for Oregon to live up to its progressive reputation and values.
Construction of what is now the Rose Quarter Freeway (you can see Harriet Tubman Middle School in the photo!) circa 1962.
Circling back to something I know a little more about – there are few vestiges of American cities reflecting a racist paradigm of urban planning than the freeways built through Black neighborhoods in cities across the country. The largest Black neighborhood in the state of Oregon was bisected by construction of I-5, eliminating decades of Black wealth and destroying invaluable civic fabric and community ties.
Today, the racist legacy of freeway construction continues in how these structures operate. In many cases the residents near freeways are lower income, and have a greater concentration of BIPOC people than other parts of the city. These residents suffer the air and noise pollution of the freeway, with stark impacts to their health, while the drivers passing by who enjoy the opportunities created by the freeway are often whiter and wealthier.
Students from the Harriet Tubman Middle School Environmental Justice Club, testifying at a JPACT hearing last fall, in opposition to freeway expansions across the region.
That’s why I’m so committed to applying the concept of “Just Transition” or “Green New Deal” to our region’s transportation investments and policies. We must center these voices as we, as a region, deal with the threat posed by the climate emergency. We must explicitly center economic opportunity for the communities that have been marginalized by our current racist economy and planning processes. Our investments in public transit, biking and walking must be guided by the needs and demands of BIPOC communities.
Climate change is more severely impact BIPOC communities, and
Racism is sapping the human potential that we need to address climate change!
I’m continuing to listen and learn in this exciting time, and I am looking forward to fighting white supremacy to make Metro’s policies, plans and actions anti-racist.
It has been an incredible experience running in a race with five highly capable candidates. I appreciate very much that we were able to campaign on ideas and contrast the varied experiences that we would each bring to the Metro Council.
I want to thank Cameron Whitten for his energy, enthusiasm and focus on diversity and inclusion, Karen Spencer for her fresh perspective and experience around natural area issues and Mary Peveto for her passionate advocacy for clean air and environmental justice.
I look forward to engaging Mary Nolan in the runoff and believe we’ll be able to draw distinctions between our policies and qualifications, particularly around making hard choices to effectively address climate change. Metro needs leadership that doesn’t compromise on our obligation to act on climate when considering investments in transportation and our future.
This column, written by Anna Griffin, was originally published in The Oregonian on August 7, 2006. Seeing as how Chris is back in the political sphere, we thought we’d share it again to highlight that he was winning accolades for his environmental advocacy of land use and transportation in the local newspaper a full 15 years ago.
Modern day Chris, in 2020, reading The Oregonian article from 2006
The scene repeats itself any time the Portland City Council considers a serious matter of land use, transportation, neighborhood planning or civic engagement. First come the city bureaucrats, spouting earnest techno-babble explanations of the day’s issue. Next come the professional lobbyists, their presentations as polished as their dress shoes. Then the neighborhood activists passionately point out how the city has failed to consider them.
Finally, a nondescript-looking man approaches the microphone.
He carries prepared remarks, but does not lecture. He congratulates city leaders for their hard work. He suggests loopholes they might have missed. He leads them to his point, Socratic-method style, in a soft voice tinged with a hint of a New England accent.
Who is Chris Smith, if not a lobbyist or a neighborhood activist or a bureaucrat? He’s a pro bono political operative who does everything from data analysis to door-to-door campaigning for progressive candidates and causes. A deep-thinking advocate for smarter transportation planning who can’t seem to resist a City Club research project. A foodie. A biker. A blogger. An outsider who nudged his way inside by working hard and showing up.
Striding into City Hall or the headquarters of Metro, the regional government, Smith turns few heads. The 46-year-old shows up at most places in nothing more formal than shorts and a polo shirt, squinting slightly behind his glasses. He has that so-geeky-he’s-hip thing going, from the T eo hooked to his bike messenger’s bag to the “four or five” computers humming at home.
Yet when it comes to promoting the kind of smart, urban-centric planning that attracts people to Portland, Smith hangs out on the cutting edge. Among his current projects: extending the Portland Streetcar to the east side of the Willamette River. Expanding the city’s network of bike paths and trails. Keeping alive the prospect of a Burnside-Couch couplet. Crafting a long-term vision for the region. Preserving public financing of City Hall campaigns.
Few people in Portland or Oregon practice the time-gobbling art of civic involvement to the same degree as Smith, a man of many metaphorical hats along with the hiker’s fedora he sports anytime the sun threatens to shine.
Smith did not expect to get so involved in civic affairs when Tektronix moved him here in 1988 from Boston. He’d been a student government do-gooder in high school and college, but by the time of his transfer he was too focused on his career as a computer engineer to worry about politicians and planners.
Like plenty of transplanted Portlanders, Smith assumed he would head back to the Northeast in a few years. Instead, life intervened.
In 1991, he moved from the Beaverton area to North Portland. He fell in love with the neighborhood, which reminded him of the urbane yet easy-to-navigate European cities he’d visited for work. He also fell hard for Staci Paley, a fellow technology whiz. Their relationship has survived more than a decade, despite the fact that she prefers to drive everywhere and he is a transit fiend who also walks 15,000 steps or bikes 15 miles a day to help his weight and blood pressure. A passion for his new neighborhood spurred the activism that ran in his genes: In his hometown in western Massachusetts, his mother led the League of Women Voters and ran for City Council; his father served on the local hospital and Chamber of Commerce boards. Curious about his new community, Smith attended a few neighborhood meetings. He discovered he had a brain for the way zoning laws and traffic patterns shape how people live. He became more and more involved and educated until he ended up serving as the Northwest Portland neighborhood association’s transportation expert for a long and nasty debate over parking.
From there, he branched out. He worked for Our Oregon in its 2000 statewide campaigns against anti-tax measures proposed by conservative activist Bill Sizemore. He joined the volunteer board planning the streetcar. He signed up for City Club. Eventually, he went part time at Xerox, where he now works. Now, he says, “I spend 30 hours a week making a living and 30 hours a week making a difference.”
While many neighborhood activists stick to their own backyards, and their own real estate investments, Smith’s passion for public engagement is an intellectual pursuit as much as a matter of the heart –or the pocketbook.
He’s a systems guy, trained to view the world as a series of interlocking parts. When he goes to work –commuting to Xerox’s Wilsonville office by bicycle and bus –he spends his days trying to make computer systems link up as efficiently as possible. When he stays home, he strives to ensure that each zoning decision, road map and mass-transit leg meshes with the larger scheme.
He quotes Winston Churchill on infrastructure –“We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us.”–then launches into his own interpretation, barely pausing to catch a breath: “The interstate highway system really shaped modern America, right? So we’re making decisions right now in this region that will affect how we live for decades to come.” Unlike many neighborhood and civic organizers, Smith is more pragmatist than idealist. In the debate about parking in Northwest Portland, for example, he tried to negotiate with developers to push pay stations and permit parking over large garages. Smith and his neighbors eventually lost in court. Yet even people on the other side credit him with being open to compromise.
“He’s not the classic citizen activist, always coming to argue against things,” said David Bragdon, Metro Council president, who also got his start as a Northwest neighborhood advocate.
Two other reasons politicians and bureaucrats pay attention: Smith works his tail off, staying up late to sort through political spending reports, toiling for hours over maps showing where in town the City Council candidates collected their contributions and tracking down every pertinent public record on any given topic. Also, he’s there. It seems simple, but just showing up at all the hearings and presentations that precede a government vote presents a steep hurdle for many activists. They’re too busy making a living.
“Chris is a guardian of the public process,” said Scott Bricker, policy director at the Bicycle Transportation Alliance. He cites Smith’s recent successful effort to force Metro to waive a $30 charge for a June brainstorming meeting on regional growth. “As a lobbyist, I’ll wear a suit and a tie, I’ll go to these events because I’m paid to go. Chris shows up in his sunglasses, his hat, his shorts. He’s walked there or biked there,” Bricker said. “But because he has the patience and the time to do what most people can’t –take part in this grueling process –they pay attention.”
Hesitant to go professional
With his computer skills, tenacity and aw-shucks charm, Smith could surely get paid for much of the work he now does for free. He’s played with the idea of running for office but never bit. Every now and then, friends suggest he go into business as a consultant advising candidates or organizing grass-roots campaigns.
He’s not so sure. For one thing, a large part of his credibility and freedom comes from the fact that he’s doing this because he cares, not to pay the mortgage. If he was focused on one thing, beholden to a boss, would he have time to make those regular calls to Portland Streetcar president Rick Gustafson to point out vandalism or technical glitches?
Would he still have the credibility to point out to city Auditor Gary Blackmer what he perceives as holes in the city’s lobbying rules? Would anybody listen when he shows up to argue for city government to cut Flexcar a break on parking fees? If he went into business, he might also have to get rid of those home-printed business cards, unlike anything anybody else carries in this town.
On the back, the card lists Web addresses for his blog, the Portland Streetcar, the Metro Policy Advisory Council and the City Council. The front side is simpler and answers, in blocky blue, black and white type, that nagging question about Smith. Given all his activities and interests, what the heck is he?
“Chris Smith, Citizen Activist.”
Read Chris Smith’s blog at www.portlandtransport.com.
